California’s recidivism rate is now 61.0 percent
SACRAMENTO
– The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)
today released its 2013 Outcome Evaluation Report, the fourth in a
series of annual reports tracking and analyzing the recidivism – or
reoffending – rates of adult felons released from state prison. The
report shows that the total three-year recidivism rate for all felons
released during fiscal year 2008-2009 is 61.0 percent, down from 63.7
percent last year and down from 67.5 percent four years ago.
“The
continuing improvement in the state’s recidivism rate is encouraging
news for all Californians,” CDCR Secretary Jeff Beard said. “When former
offenders are leading productive, law abiding lives, our communities
are safer. As we move forward and both CDCR and counties utilize state
funds to invest more in evidence-based rehabilitation efforts, I’m
confident we will see recidivism rates continue to decline.”
CDCR
measures recidivism by arrests, convictions and returns to prison and
uses the latter measure – returns to prison – as its primary measure of
recidivism. CDCR’s return-to-prison measure includes offenders released
from prison after having served their sentence for a crime as well as
offenders released from prison after having served their term for a
parole violation. All felons are tracked for the full three-year
follow-up period, regardless of their status on parole or if they have
discharged.
In fiscal year 2008-2009, 112,877 people were
released or re-released from state prison and recidivated at a rate of
61.0 percent within three years.
The 2013 report focuses on the
68,803 inmates who returned to custody within three years of release. It
also looks at demographics, including gender, age, ethnicity, offense,
mental health status, length of stay, risk category and other factors
and offers data and insights to CDCR executives, policy makers and
correctional stakeholders.
The report’s findings include:
• Nearly 50 percent of inmates who recidivate within three years do so within the first six months.
• Women recidivate at a lower rate (48.9 percent) than men (62.4 percent).
•
Although few in number, inmates released after serving an indeterminate
sentence recidivate at a much lower rate (11.5 percent) than those who
served a determinate sentence (61.0 percent).
• Despite the fact
that Los Angeles County had the largest share of inmates released to
parole (25.8 percent), its recidivism rate of 50.4 percent is the lowest
of the 12 counties with the largest number of releases.
• San
Joaquin, Stanislaus and Fresno counties have the highest overall
three-year recidivism rates at 75.8 percent, 72.2 percent and 71.3
percent respectively.
• In general, recidivism rates decrease with
age. Felons aged 18 to 19 years old have a 73.7 percent recidivism
rate; those age 60 and older have a 45.2 recidivism rate.
• The
seriousness of an inmate’s commitment crime is often inversely related
to his/her recidivism risk. For example, second-degree murderers have a
recidivism rate of 10.3 percent while people convicted of vehicle theft
have a 72.5 percent recidivism rate.
• Overall, inmates with identified mental health issues recidivate at a higher rate than those without mental health issues.
Assembly
Bill 109, the California Public Safety Realignment Act, became law on
October 1, 2011. The law changed where people convicted of non-violent,
non-serious and non-sex offenses serve their sentences. CDCR researchers
expect that Realignment will have an impact on recidivism, but the
impact is not significant in this report because it focuses on offenders
released before Realignment’s implementation.
CDCR researchers
did recently release a report that tracked inmates released from prison
pre- and post-Realignment. It can be found here: http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/Adult_Research_Branch/Research_Documents/Realignment_1_Year_Report_12-23-13.pdf
The
2013 Outcome Evaluation Report is published by CDCR’s Office of
Research, which provides research data analysis and evaluation to
implement evidence-based programs and practices, strengthen policy,
inform management decisions and ensure accountability.